Current:Home > ContactWest Virginia lawmakers reject bill to expand DNA database to people charged with certain felonies -Prime Capital Blueprint
West Virginia lawmakers reject bill to expand DNA database to people charged with certain felonies
Poinbank View
Date:2025-04-09 08:07:27
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (AP) — West Virginia lawmakers on Thursday soundly rejected a bill that would have expanded a law enforcement database to include collecting DNA samples from people arrested for certain felonies.
Some legislators cited privacy concerns during a lengthy debate before the 66-30 vote by the Republican-dominated House of Delegates. Three members were absent.
“This is just another step away from our liberties,” said Republican Del. Rolland Jennings of Preston County.
Current state law requires a DNA sample to be taken from anyone convicted of a felony and certain misdemeanors. The bill would have expanded the law to obtain DNA through cheek swabs from adults arrested on felony charges of violence against someone, a burglary or a case involving a minor. The samples would be sent to a state crime lab and the results stored in an FBI database.
“If you don’t want your DNA taken, don’t do a heinous crime,” said Republican Del. Scot Heckert, a bill supporter.
But some Democrats were concerned about the bill’s potential infringement on Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.
“This bill is extremely broad,” Ohio County Democrat Shawn Fluharty said. “It’s dangerous territory to put people in a DNA database simply because they’ve been arrested just for probable cause and accused of a crime.”
Mason County Republican Jonathan Pinson, a bill supporter, said it was no more of a constitutional concern than collecting fingerprints from suspects. Pinson said lawmakers should be more concerned about helping crime victims whose cases remain unsolved “because we don’t know where to look” for evidence.
The bill also contained steps to expunge someone’s DNA records from the database if they were cleared of the felony charges.
Prior to the vote, the House twice rejected bids to halt debate on the bill.
veryGood! (12)
Related
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- Anthropologie Quietly Added Thousands of New Items to Their Sale Section: Get a $110 Skirt for $20 & More
- Your Multivitamin Won't Save You
- Jurassic Park Actress Ariana Richards Recreates Iconic Green Jello Scene 30 Years Later
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- Affirmative action in college admissions and why military academies were exempted by the Supreme Court
- Zendaya Sets the Record Straight on Claim She Was Denied Entry to Rome Restaurant
- Selling Sunset's Amanza Smith Shares Update on Massive Pain Amid Hospitalization
- Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
- Trump special counsel investigations cost over $9 million in first five months
Ranking
- Rylee Arnold Shares a Long
- Big entertainment bets: World Cup & Avatar
- Affirmative action in college admissions and why military academies were exempted by the Supreme Court
- Miley Cyrus Loves Dolce Glow Self-Tanners So Much, She Invested in Them: Shop Her Faves Now
- Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
- Entrepreneurs Built Iowa’s Solar Economy. A Utility’s Push for Solar Fees Could Shut Them Down.
- Andy Cohen Reveals the Raquel Leviss Moment That Got Cut From Vanderpump Rules' Reunion
- Deep Decarbonization Plans for Michigan’s Utilities, but Different Paths
Recommendation
Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
There's a shortage of vets to treat farm animals. Pandemic pets are partly to blame
Nordstrom Rack 62% Off Handbag Deals: Kate Spade, Béis, Marc Jacobs, Longchamp, and More
Ricky Martin and husband Jwan Yosef divorcing after six years of marriage
What to watch: O Jolie night
Hiring cools as employers added 209,000 jobs in June
Billie Eilish Cheekily Responds to Her Bikini Photo Showing Off Chest Tattoo
The Best Protection For Forests? The People Who Live In Them.